Conroy induces mass facepalming

Conroy induces mass facepalming

Written February 11, 2010

If you’re one of our Australian readers, you may have seen people today muttering: “Oh gawd, he didn’t just say… he did?  Really?“. And if you’re one of the poor unfortunates who didn’t get where the random resentment was aimed at, well by all means let me fill you in.

Our fearless Federal Minister for Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy, Stephen Conroy, has asked Google to censor any content on YouTube that would fall into the Australian “Refused Classification” category.  In the process, he’s compared Australian internet policy to that of China and Thailand … as though that were a good thing.

Seriously:

Google at the moment filters an enormous amount of material on behalf of the Chinese government; they filter an enormous amount of material on behalf of the Thai government.  What we’re saying is, well in Australia, these are our laws and we’d like you to apply our laws.

-Stephen “I did it for the lulz” Conroy

If your friends or co-workers struck this pose today, it's likely they read this story...

To put this in context, China is one of the 13 countries that the Paris-based NGO Reporters Sans Frontières lists as an “enemy of the internet”, putting them in the same category as Iran and North Korea.

Way to put us in the same room as the enemies of the internet, Senator Conroy!

Google has (thankfully) told the minister that they won’t comply voluntarily, citing among other things the fact that YouTube already has stringent content guidelines, the fact that the request was way too broad and the fact that they’re threatening to leave the Chinese market to get away from increasingly stringent censorship demands.

Plus there’s small stuff like the Australian government probably doesn’t have any jurisdiction over foreign-hosted websites like YouTube anyway.

You can see the whole interview with the minister on the Hungry Beast website (be patient, they’re getting spiked traffic at the moment), which is where this particular Conroy failboat set sail.  You can also read the full article over at the Sydney Morning Herald for more info and be sure to use a full strength palm moisturiser to avoid face chafing.

Tags: , , , ,

3 Responses to “Conroy induces mass facepalming”

  1. Matt says:

    Watching that interview, there is no way you can’t rage. Conroy insists that filtering the internet is OK because the Classification Board is a seperate entity, hence it’s not the Government imposing it’s views.

    If that’s true, why the FUCK do we need to oust that stupid prick Atkinson to get our R18+ ratings for games? Couldn’t we just ask the Classification Board if they think it’s appropriate?

    No, because their guidelines are dictated by the Attourneys-General, and they’re democratically elected members of, oh right, the government.

    How did we get into such a state of affairs that voting for Tony Abbott started looking like an attractive option?

  2. Simon says:

    Crazy, I did strike a pose like that yesterday. What a Grade-A Douchebag.

    I love his new name, though. For the lulz.

  3. Rob says:

    I’ve not had a chance to watch the clip, but having read the article from the SMH – my rather minimal faith in humanity dropped that bit further.

    I just can’t believe that Conroy would ask Google to even consider this – especially light of their comments about China (and the hack).

    The fact that he’s explicitly named dropped China in all of this is scary to the bone.

    But yeah – I do have to agree with Matt on this one… I’m just as horrified to find that Abbott is even an option.

    (Man, it’s times like this that I wish Costello didn’t pull a Starscream and stayed on. He was a jerk in some respects, but you knew where he stood, and was a bit considerate socially).

Leave a Reply